마스터프렙 No.1 유학생 전문 인터넷 강의 사이트

COMMUNITY

Title

[Ki Young Song] LEQ Feedback Requested

송기영 선생님의 MCQ로 정리하는 AP U.S. History Part.1(Unit.1~5) 23강 완성

Author

ksj***

Date Posted

2025-04-24 오전 10:17:50

Hello!

To prepare for the AP exam, I did a practice LEQ and I would love to get it "scored" by you and get some feedback.

I would especially appreciate feedback on forming a good thesis, linking the historical context skill point (like cause and effect, change vs continuity, etc) to my overall essay, and help on formatting the conclusion.

I understand that you are busy since it is APUSH exam season, but I would truly appreciate getting a general "score" you would give me if you were to grade this, and feedback!

I have attached my LEQ and the prompt is also inside the attached file in bold.

Sincerely,

ksj

Attachment

LEQPractice.pdf

2025-04-25 오전 3:13:59

As you know, it's AP season, so I'm very busy and it's difficult for me to personally review and revise essays. Even under normal circumstances, essay feedback takes a lot of time, so I usually charge a separate fee for that service.

However, with the recent rapid development of AI, I tried asking ChatGPT to evaluate your essay, and the results were quite impressive. The feedback was not much different from my own, and I believe it can be a useful reference. If you ask specific questions - such as for an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of your essay, ways to improve its weaknesses, or how to raise your score - ChatGPT will provide detailed answers. I recommend using it as a helpful tool.

Category	Score	Evaluation

Thesis / Claim

✅ 1/1

Clear thesis addressing the prompt with two specific points (conflict & regulation).

Contextualization

✅ 1/1

Provides relevant background on pre-1754 settler expansion and Native conflicts.

Evidence

✅ 2/2

Multiple accurate examples (e.g., Proclamation of 1763, Northwest Ordinance) well connected to the argument.

Analysis & Reasoning

✅ 1/2

Basic cause-and-effect reasoning is present, but lacks complexity and deeper analysis.

Total

5/6

Strong structure and evidence, but missing nuanced analysis for a higher score.